 |
Trains would run just a few feet from hundreds of homes and apartments along the Trail.
|
A 66' wide swath would be bulldozed and all the trees would be clear-cut to make way for the light rail. In place of this 12' wide berm, there would be double tracks and catenary wires.
And while destroying the trail, the proposed Light Rail Purple Line would fail to meet
the long term transportation needs of the Region.
In contrast, a seamless Metro Line (which would be heavy rail) connecting the two legs of the Red Line (which are heavy rail) would:
- be faster,
- carry more riders,
- provide quicker connections,
- allow for expansion,
- allow Metro trains to move back and forth between the two legs of the Red Line, and
- improve Metro's flexibility and capability to respond to emergencies.
Studies have shown:
The Light Rail Purple Line:
* would NOT relieve traffic congestion;
* would NOT take cars off the road;
* would
NOT reduce pollution;
* would NOT seamlessly connect the two arms of Metro's Red Line;
* could Not run Metro cars between Bethesda and Silver Spring -- even in emergencies.
The light rail would require transfers from
the metro, to the light rail, and back to Metro.
It would require the creation of a totally new transportation system, distinct from Metro, with new
operating systems, new operators, new cars and separate maintenance systems.
|